Which version do you like better? I couldn't decide.
Version 1:
On November 18, 2012 President Obama said: "And there’s no country on Earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders." So how does that square with President Obama's policy of drone strikes in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen especially since U.S. drone strikes have killed innocent civilians in those countries alongside militant? Does the white house think that Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen should tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from the U.S.?
Version 2:
On November 18, 2012 President Obama said:"And there’s no country on Earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders. So we are fully supportive of Israel’s right to defend itself from
missiles landing on people’s homes and workplaces and potentially
killing civilians. "
So how does that square with President Obama's policy of drone strikes
in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen especially since U.S. drone strikes have
killed innocent civilians in those countries alongside militant? Does
the white house think that Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen should tolerate
missiles raining down on its citizens from the U.S.?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
WCF Chapter One "Of Holy Scripture" Sunday School (Sept.-Oct. 2021)
Our text for Sunday School (also "The Confession of Faith and Catechisms") Biblical Theology Bites What is "Biblical Theology...
-
Voddie Baucham , Pastor of Grace Family Baptist Church in Spring, Texas, explains what it means to " support Israel ": But there’s...
-
On September 7, everyone’s favorite “anti-theist” wrote an article that concluded with sappy pathos and not enough appeals to the U.S. Cons...
No comments:
Post a Comment