“Bart Ehrman’s career is testament to the fact that no one can slice and dice a belief system more surgically than someone who grew up inside it.” —
Salon.com via New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman's old website.
There is a lot of truth to this maxim; but its applicability, as it suggests, extends far beyond just ex-Christians like Ehrman. It even extends beyond religion.
Thomas Sowell, for example, was a marxist that didn't come around to free-markets until he saw his
god, his economic
religious system, his
beliefs he was immersed in, fail. This happened while he was interning for the U.S. federal government in the Department of Labor (I think).
He now is, as he has been for decades, dismantling the left-wing
worldview in his weekly columns and books.
American humorist P.J. O' Rourke was also a man of the left, until he got a job, he's quipped a few times.
Christopher Hitchens, whom I will mention again below, was once a committed Trotskyist and socialist in the 1970s and 80s and later came to embrace, well,
something.
It's not clear that he is writing approvingly, but in the foreword to
Choice: The Best of Reason, Hitchens writes:
But the subsequent industrial and technological revolutions have displaced a good deal of power and initiative away from states and corporations--and the unspoken alliance between them--and toward the individual worker and producer. More than this, they have greatly attenuated the frontiers of states and nations and made it easier to be an everyday "internationalist" than many once-leftist parties would have believed possible. [1]
At the very bottom, this is a major admission of the success of capitalism from a former socialist.
Ex-Christians turned atheists, Ex-atheists turned Christians
There are also many ex-atheists who spend much of their life dedicated to sharing the gospel of Jesus and God's coming kingdom to unbelievers. C.S. Lewis,
whom I've never actually read yet, except for that liar, lunatic, or Lord line,* comes to mind (I don't think that's too much of a simplification of my past).
Lewis, went on to write many books defending Christianity, such as
Mere Christianity, and creatively shared the Christian worldview in his works of fiction, the most notable probably being the
Chronicles of Narnia series. (I hear the space trilogy series is pretty good too.)
Some less prominent examples such as David Wood and
former Ex-Atheist.com proprietor A.S.A. Jones; others include Peter Hitchens, Alister McGrath, Francis Collins, John Harwick Montgomery, Marvin Olasky, and novelist A.N. Wilson.
Heck, even the late philosopher Antony Flew, who did
not become a Christian his last years, became a deist (his words), and
put out a book about how he believes in God, albeit a sort of
"Aristotelean god."
Richard Dawkins and the late Christopher Hitchens and are on the opposite end of the spectrum. Dawkins admitted to losing his "last vestiges of religious faith" (if I can recall that correctly from
The God Delusion Debate DVD with John Lennox) in his teenage years; Hitchens, in his adolescence (around 9).
Dawkins was actually very explicit about why he believed as a young Christian. Via Wikipedia:
"the main residual reason why I was religious was from being so impressed with the complexity of life and feeling that it had to have a designer, and I think it was when I realised that Darwinism was a far superior explanation that pulled the rug out from under the argument of design. And that left me with nothing."
And then, he spends his entire life not striding against religion -- no, that came in recent years -- but in the scientific field explaining the Darwinian origins of life; fleshing out that theory, defending that theory, and re-telling the gospel of Darwin for each generation anew with such works as
The Selfish Gene (1976),
The Extended Phenotype (1982),
The Blind Watchmaker: Why The Evidence of Evolution Reveals A Universe Without Design (1986),
River Out of Eden, (1995)
Climbing Mount Improbable (1996),
Unweaving the Rainbow (1998),
The Ancestor's Tale (2004),
The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution (2009), and
The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True (2011), never letting the gospel get stale.
In other words, he spent his career "surgically" explaining away design -- the very thing he used to believe in.
And if you were wondering why I described Dawkin's work as
gospel, it's because I just saw the video below. N.T. Wright, in his own right, is a master at explaining the gospel to new generations of Christians. Pick up his
"For Everyone" series to see what I mean.
[Editor's Update January 13, 2013 7:30 PM] It's somewhat of a
genetic fallacy to say that because someone is an ex-believer in some religious belief or some economic philosophy, such as those mentioned above, that their new beliefs are true. However, the fact that they did leave one faith and now believe in something else should raise some eyebrows.
*I know Lewis is not actually quoted in that link. However, I decided to link to perhaps one of the first websites that introduced that line of argument to me;
The Case For Christ DVD possibly being the other source for me.
Wikipedia has the quote in it's entirety and actually much to say about it from many sides.
[1]
Gillespie, Nick. "Foreword." Foreword. Choice: The Best of Reason. Dallas: BenBella, 2004. 4.
